QA：《孙子兵法》是关于什么的？它有什么用处？_风闻

【来源龙腾网】

评论原创翻译

Sam Eiji, art of war

It is very useful if you can learn something from it.

It is not very useful if you learn nothing from it.

The books would been  particularly useful if you could grasp something from those books and it let you to defeat a  much superior army.

Vietnam warAfghan warSomalia warIraq warYemen war911 attack.You could apply those theory in other field too.

Many people apply it in the field of business, share market, and politics.

Maybe Donald trumps are well versed in those Sun Tzu theory.

Trumps beats all his competitor easily.

Trumps make all kind of mistake, yet he can still prevail over his competitor.

The Media cant kill off his popularity.- smearing campaign, hatred.

The Media cant destroy him.

【回答】

如果你能从中学到一些东西，那它就非常有用。

如果你从中学不到任何东西，那它就没多大用处。

如果你能从书中学到一些东西，并且能够打败一支强大得多的军队，那么这书就特别有用。

越南战争、阿富汗战争、索马里战争、也门战争和911袭击，你也可以把这些理论应用到其他领域。

许多人将其应用于商业、股票市场和政治领域。

也许唐纳德特朗普精通孙子的理论。特朗普轻而易举地击败了所有的竞争对手。

虽然特朗普犯了各种各样的错误，但他仍然可以战胜他的竞争对手。媒体抹杀不了他的声望。媒体毁不了他。

Abu Kedem (Rechavia Berman), I translated the Sun Tzu into Hebrew

Many, but to pick two you may have heard of: Mao Tse Tung and Vo Nguyen Giap, the commander of the Viet Cong who defeated the mighty USA. Both utilized Master Sun’s principles and defeated opponents who were, on paper, far stronger than their own.

There’s an anecdote (true or apocryphal, it’s so good I have to share it) about an American retired general meeting with a Vietcong counterpart many years after the war had ended and both nations resumed relations. The two men shared a beverage and talked about the war.

The American said: You know, you guys never beat us in a battle. Not once.

The Vietnamese said: This is true. It’s also irrelevant.

【回答】我翻译了希伯来语的《孙子兵法》

许多关联，我选择两个你可能已经听说过: 毛和越共指挥官武元甲，他们都打败了强大的美国。 两人都运用了孙子的原则，打败了名义上比自己强大得多的对手。

有一则轶事(不管真假，我必须要分享)是关于一位美国退休将军在战争结束两国恢复关系的多年后，与一位越共同僚会面的。 这两个人喝着酒，谈论着战争。

这个美国人说：你知道，你们这些家伙从来没有在战斗中打败过我们。 一次也没有。

而那个越南人说：这是事实，但也是无关紧要的事实。

Ricky Sng

In the past, most of the leaders in the Sengoku Jidai in Japan all used tactics based on or straight out from the book.

In modern times, some similarities in how IJA’s General Yamashita blustered and bluffed his way and cheated Malaya out of AE Perceivals and the British hands.

Many generals in WW2 used some tactics that were listed such as the use of spies for espionage etc. Would recommend this volume.

【回答】

在过去，日本四国时代的大部分领导人都使用基于或直接从《孙子兵法》中出来的战术。

在现代，日本帝国陆军的山下将军是如何虚张声势并欺骗马来亚脱离英国人的手中的。

第二次世界大战中的许多将军使用了一些战术，例如进行间谍活动等。 我推荐这本书。

Lawrence Wong, AI Blockchain Cloud Mobile

Absolutely! The numbers, venues and weapons may be obsolete, but the strategic considerations are as relevant today as in Sun Tzu’s time. To think otherwise is to be ignorant of current affairs and business practices. Sadly, USA is paying the enormous costs of such monumental stupidity.

Compare and contrast the costs/benefits and consequences of the two Iraqi wars..

thus the highest form of generalship is to balk the enemy’s plans; the next best is to prevent the junction of the enemy’s forces; the next in order is to attack the enemy’s army in the field; and the worst policy of all is to besiege walled cities.。

Bush 41 isolated Saddam Hussein by skillfully exploiting internal Shiite, Kurdish divisions; building a UN-approved coalition such that even Russia abandoned Saddam. Attacking remotely, where Saddam least expect it, victory was swift and devastating. Saddam was already lost when he ordered a chaotic, withdrawal, leading to the biggest Turkey shoot in history. Desert Storm was universally applauded as a text-book case of overwhelming strategic and tactical success. US even made a nominal profit. Bush 41 wisely allowed Saddam to stay in power to maintain strategic balance in the region.

In contrast, Bush 43 made the worst decision to “besiege the city.” Drunk with misguided pride and missionary zeal after initial success against the Taliban in Afghanistan, he asserted that Saddam was behind the 911 attacks, sextively denying American intelligence reports that Al Qaeda, no friend of secular Saddam, was responsible. Then, failing to show credible proof of weapons of mass destruction and thus no UN resolution, he twisted arms to attack with only the “coalition of the willing.” Winning battle after battle but at enormous costs, and seeing no crowds bearing flowers and sweets. Instead, decade-long insurgencies and the rise of DAESH. The total tab is $2 trillions and counting, thus arguably losing the peace.

So indirectly, the path of China rising is cleared by strategic failure of Bush 43 administration in understanding Sun Tzu’s philosophy.

【回答】AI区块链云移动

当然！虽然数量、地点和武器可能已经过时了，但战略考虑在当代和孙子的时代同样重要。如果不这样想的话，就会对时事和商业惯例一无所知。 可悲的是，美国正在为愚蠢透顶付出巨大的代价。

比较两次伊拉克战争的成本、收益和后果……

“故上兵伐谋，其次伐交，其次伐兵，其下攻城”

因此，将军最高的谋略是阻止敌人的计划，其次是阻止敌人的军队汇合，其次是在战场上攻击敌人的军队，最糟糕的是围攻有城墙的城市。

老布什通过巧妙地利用什叶派内部的库尔德人分裂孤立了萨达姆，建立了一个联合国批准的联盟，甚至连俄罗斯也抛弃了萨达姆。在萨达姆最意想不到的地方进行远程攻击，这场胜利是迅速而毁灭性的。当萨达姆下令进行撤退时，导致了历史上最大规模的土耳其枪击事件，他已经失败了。“沙漠风暴行动”被普遍称赞为战略和战术上取得压倒性胜利的教科书案例。 美国甚至得到了名义利润。 老布什总统明智地允许萨达姆继续掌权，以维持该地区的战略平衡。

相比之下，小布什做出的最糟糕的决定是“围攻城市”。在阿富汗打击塔利班取得初步成功后，他带着被误导的骄傲和传教士般的热情，坚称萨达姆是9.11的幕后黑手，有选择性地否认美国情报机构关于基地组织跟萨达姆没有关系。然后，由于没有大规模杀伤性武器的可靠证据，也就没有联合国的决议，他只好在“自愿联盟”的支持下，进行攻击。赢得了一场又一场的战争，但付出了巨大的代价，没有看到人群捧着鲜花和糖果迎接。 相反，十年之久的叛乱和伊斯兰国的崛起。 总账单是2万亿美元，而且还在增加中，因此可以说失去了和平。

所以间接地，中国崛起道路的障碍被小布什扫清了，只因为他未理解孙子的哲学。